Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Regular and irregular shapes can confuse

  • Comment
Letters

We were interested to read Alex Chablo's query (Letters, AJ 3/10.8.00), where he asks about fitting interlocking hexagons onto a spherical surface.

This apparent contradict ion comes from the meaning of the word 'hexagon'. The technical definition is a planar shape with six sides. In this context, Grimshaw is correct in stating that methods are available for designing geodesic spheres tiled with irregular hexagons, such as the system used by Norman Foster and Buro Happold for the Globe Restaurant atop the Al Faisaliah tower in Riyadh.

However, in Weyl's book Symmetry, he must be referring to regular-hexagons (all six sides the same length), since it is indeed impossible to cover a sphere w ith regular-hexagons.

It should also be recognised that regular triangles (icosahedron) or a combination of hexagons and pentagons (truncated-icosahedron or buckyball) can also be used in various ways to form a spherical tiled surface.

Here at Buro Happold we write our own software routines (using C++ language) to create regular tiled and noded geometries falling on a variety of geometrical shapes to suit many and varied project requirements.

Ken Jones and Paul Shepherd, Buro Happold, Bath

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.