Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Ray of hope for Crystal Palace multiplex objectors

  • Comment

The controversial plan to build a leisure complex on London's Crystal Palace Park was cast into further doubt this week with the news that the developer has agreed to meet a consortium with a radically different approach to the sensitive site.

London & Regional Properties director Geoff Springer is set to meet the Crystal Palace Consortium and its architect, Tarsem Flora of Agenda 21 Architects, on 5 March to discuss alternative plans to the Ian Ritchie/RHWL scheme, which has become bogged down amid legal objections.

The consortium wants Springer to abandon his plan for a £75 million, 20-screen multiplex which was originally drawn up by Ian Ritchie but is now being overseen by RHWL. Instead of this scheme, Flora has drawn up a £100 million plan for four cinemas and a revamp of the existing Crystal Palace sports complex. The cinemas would be underground and on a different area of the park, which would mean that the site of the current proposal would stay as Metropolitan Open Land.

The agenda for the meeting has not been fixed but Flora said that the fact that Springer has agreed to consider their case at all is a positive step.

'We don't know why he would ask us in if he wasn't looking at other options, ' he said. Springer was unavailable to comment on the meeting.

The existing scheme has planning permission from the Borough of Bromley, but the European Commission has placed a question mark over its validity by claiming that permission has been granted without the environmental impact assessment which is required by European Union law.

In addition a local resident has won the right to a full judicial review of the planning permission in the Court of Appeal, possibly in July.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.