Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Questions of correction before the election

  • Comment

Paul Hyett's letter (AJ 30. 11. 00) describes me as issuing information about him which I know to be incorrect. I can assure him that this is not the case.

Following interviews with the candidates, the AJ published some weeks ago a summary of Paul Hyett's 'manifesto' and my own. I have no quarrel with the AJ's summary of my own position, which was entirely accurate. Within its summary of Paul Hyett's position the AJ reported that:

'Hyett will. . . Allow non-architect professionals in other parts of the building industry to use the RIBA suffix in their professional life. '

'I want to acknowledge the people in the world of architecture who have contributed substantially to the built environment in nontraditional routes, people such as clients, developers and estate managers, ' he says. 'If you haven't got Parts 1,2 and 3 you can't register and so can't use the RIBA suffix. I have already opened discussions with the ARB on how we might adjust this. '

I accordingly, and in good faith, included the following in the questions and answers section of my election website at www.alexreidwebsite.com:

Q. Do you agree with Paul Hyett's proposal to allow non-architect professionals in other parts of the construction industry to use the RIBA suffix in their professional life.

A. No. I believe it would devalue the RIBA suffix and confuse clients. The Hon Fellow scheme is already available to honour distinguished co-professionals. Everyone can join the RIBA as a subscriber member (without the right to use the RIBA suffix).

I am afraid that I missed Hyett's letter to AJ (26. 10. 00), and therefore had no idea, until reading his letter in last week's issue, that the AJreport on his manifesto had been mistaken.

I have now removed that question and answer from my website. If your readers find other matters in my website that require correction I would be grateful if they could let me know and I would be pleased to correct them.

Alex Reid, Cambridge

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.