Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Public participation isn't just mindless negativity

  • Comment
letters

I sympathise with Arthur Quarmby over the rejection ofhis planning application ('When the mobs are demagogues', Technical & Practice, aj 2/9.12.99), but the attack on the practice of public participation in his article is unacceptable (quote: 'the mob is mindless, bullying and utterly predictable in its opposition'). If we met in a pub, there might be time to cover the many points he raised. For the moment, I'll refer briefly to my experience, as a local architect, in a community consultation project in Oxford. We found that:

1. The public do not 'know, every one of them, what is proposed under development legislation'. Local plans, for example, are too general to achieve this.

2. Councillors need to be lobbied and informed about local people's priorities, as well as getting advice from officers.

3. Public opinion is often, but not 'invariably', negative. The opinions we heard - the project dealt with the design and layout of a brownfield development (the principle of developing brownfield was accepted) - included support for modern, low-energy housing.

Any readers interested in what the project achieved can contact Building Alternatives, c/o cparrack@brookes.ac.uk

Peter Ledwith, Oxford

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.