Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

PROFESSIONALISM OF THE ARB CALLED INTO QUESTION

  • Comment
LETTERS

The ARB's Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) chair Peter Verdin, after sanctioning Yolande Fothergill for failing 'to treat the board with sufficient respect', describes the ARB as a professional body. He would do well to respect the ARB's own notes, seen on its website: 'The [ARB] logo must not be used in such a way as to mislead members of the public or others into thinking that the logo signifies membership of a professional body. The ARB is not a professional body.' Indeed, the ARB is a registration body - it has registrants not members - and by extension of the ARB's point here, architects should not use the letters 'ARB' as an affix.

Last year, again according to the ARB's website, the PCC sanctioned a total of six architects - four cases stemming from registrants failing to tick the Professional Indemnity Insurance box. This leaves only two substantive cases that our registration body had to deal with, at a cost of £2.3 million to the profession.

Mr Verdin might also bear in mind that, in our free society, respect has to be earned and cannot be demanded, even by a quango.

Jack Pringle, president, RIBA

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs