Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

'Ponderous' BedZED poses more problems

  • Comment
letters

It is difficult not to support the BedZED philosophy, which places 'sustainability' high on the development agenda (AJ 25.9.03), but are we alone in finding the resulting projects worrying? Could this be another 'worthy' bandwagon destined to create more problems than it solves (like many other 'solutions' to our housing problems during the past 50 years)?

As architects, our role is usually to provide some order, design economically and create delight in arrangement of form and use of materials. We need to design buildings that are a pleasure to use and tolerant of change, but history has shown that, especially where housing is concerned, a degree of humility and ordinariness is usually a virtue.

BedZED's models are experimental and therefore expensive.

They are deterministic. They reflect a dogma that, however worthy, results in highly prescriptive architectural solutions.

They are inflexible and intolerant of change. They deliberately ignore the traditional, urban pattern of streets and squares, which provide a natural order to the townscape, and provide little private open space.

It is good to be creating more 'mixed-use' communities, and in that respect the planning initiative being launched by Zogolovitch and Allford is to be applauded, but does sustainability have to default to such ponderous architectural solutions? It would be interesting to see the various initiatives being so bravely championed coming together to create projects that, while addressing problems of urban development, might fit more comfortably into our urban environment.

Charles Thomson, Charles Thomson Rivington Street Studio, London

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.