Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Please let's clarify my Future Systems missive

  • Comment

You printed my letter responding to David Canning the week before, but in changing the last paragraph from two to three sentences, rendered the whole letter incomprehensible. My point was that the supposed arrogance of Future Systems, to pursue advanced technology, is inspiring.

This remains the case despite their work being qualified by environmentalist notions of developmental responsibilities. The final paragraph should have read as follows:

Sustainability qualifies the buildings Future Systems propose, with their own notable exception of the Lords Media Centre, but their maligned individuality raises the promise of material advancement for a mere six billion of us. Instead we need such Ego-architecture if future generations are not to despise our loss of nerve develop new resources and greater infrastructure.

Ian Abley, London E8

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.