Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Planning needs to change if buildings are to become more efficient

  • 1 Comment

Planners’ calls for ‘authentic’ windows are inconsistent with today’s needs, say Sarah Lewis and Marion Baeli

Deep energy-saving domestic retrofits at the rate of about 13,000 a week are necessary to meet the Government’s 2050 carbon reduction targets. The Government launched the £17 million Retrofit for the Future (RtF) programme in 2009 to address this challenge. Of all possible energy-saving interventions, installation of new windows has been the one measure most consistently adopted on RtF projects. Existing windows are replaced either with very efficient double glazing (sometimes vacuum-glazed) but most often with triple-glazed units with low-e coatings, which enable net solar gains rather than loss from glazed areas.

Windows are not the cheapest measure in a deep energy retrofit and their financial payback time is longer than many other improvements. However, good windows greatly increase indoor comfort. If occupants are comfortable, they are unlikely to turn the heating thermostat up. So if windows are such an important factor in decarbonising Britain, why do we still have so many single-glazed windows in the UK?

Here are some sums:

The thermal performance of a single-glazed sash windows is typically 4.3-4.8W/m²K, while the performance of a triple-glazed window is 1W/m²K, more than a four-fold improvement. Moreover, triple glazing also removes the unpleasant downdraughts associated with cold surfaces, eliminates mould growth and air-borne dust mite particles with their asthma-inducing consequences, and avoids wood rot and putty failure due to condensation. Triple glazing contributes to significant improvements in the health and comfort of occupants, as well reducing carbon emissions.

Under current planning regimes, ‘authenticity’ trumps human comfort and energy savings

Under current planning regimes, ‘authenticity’ often trumps human comfort and energy savings. Replacing windows often leads to lengthy and expensive planning negotiations, which are off-putting to organisations and individuals who wish to upgrade their properties. In different planning authorities and conservation areas, guidance varies as to what is an appropriate solution for the same building stock.

The technology of timber windows is developing rapidly to keep pace with the demands of government energy targets. High-performance timber windows that closely replicate historic sash windows are now available. The thin profiles of these advanced, conservation-standard, double-glazed windows have been carefully designed to match heritage sash windows, including their thin glazing bars. Windows which integrate very thin triple-glazed units are now also available. However, despite being almost identical in appearance to single-glazed windows, these new products are being rejected by many local authorities.

The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea is a notable exception. It recently deemed triple-glazed windows appropriate in a conservation area on a Passivhaus retrofit project by Paul Davis + Partners. The window looks identical to existing sashes from the exterior. To ensure airtightness, the bottom sash of the triple-glazed unit operates as a casement with an invisible tilt-and-turn mechanism. From the street, the difference is indiscernible.

Retrofit Insights, a recent report published by the Institute for Sustainability, suggests roll-out of exemplary low-energy refurbishments is possible with current technologies if best practice is employed. This is only possible if local authorities support adoption of high-performance products. Planners’ requirements for windows to be single-glazed, bedded in putty and hand-painted are inconsistent with 21st century needs.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs