Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Planners pleased with Leeds' CASPAR project

  • Comment
Letters

I was pleased to see your review of the CASPAR housing scheme in Leeds (AJ 3/10.8.00) because it is an excellent scheme that addresses a number of current issues. I do object, however, to Ken Powell's prejudices and inaccuracies concerning the role of Leeds planners. Far from being 'worried by the uncontextual character of the architecture', the city council argued strongly for the selection of this particular scheme at the completion stage. Subsequently, our only influence on the design was to suggest that the colour of external timber staining should relate to the surrounding red-brick Victorian architecture. The architects did not object; your readers can judge for themselves the merits of this amendment. Other references to our involvement are simply incorrect.

Finally, just to make the point that you should not believe everything you read in print, the developer was, of course, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, not the Peabody Trust!

Peter Vaughan, environmental design officer, Leeds City Council

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs