Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Piano's Shard plot should not be part of the plan

  • Comment
Letters

The grant of planning permission for the London Bridge 'Shard' tower is indeed problematic, as Tom Ball says (AJ 27.11.03), representing as it does gross over-development on a small site in a tightly packed area.

The idea that such a major project, with such wide-ranging implications, cutting across UDP and other established policies, can be approved, very largely on questionable assessments of design quality, is certainly disturbing.

Planning decisions should, as far as possible, be made on objective criteria, minimising subjective assessments. In this respect, the abolition of plot ratio as a criterion during the unlamented regime of Nicholas Ridley and Margaret Thatcher was surely ill-advised. Plot ratio may have led to anomalies on particular sites and to have been a relatively blunt instrument, but at least it was an objective bulwark against over-development. While not precluding the tallest buildings (the NatWest Tower was built under plot ratio constraints), it would tend to discourage them and ensure that there is adequate space around them.

The notion that tall buildings should be tightly clustered is, I believe, a serious mistake. They require space around them.

James Dunnett, London N1

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs