Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

paul hyett

  • Comment
Why A levels are irrelevant for aspiring architects

In three years time, the distinctions awarded with degree qualifications will most likely go to students with the best A-level results: those with two A grades and a B or those with the lowest, that is, three D grades or less.

This is the chilling truth revealed by the research of the admissions department which tracks students' progress at one of our leading universities. And it's a truth that opens up a hornet's nest of arguments between those academics who continue to insist that A levels are a worthy and reliable guide to appropriate candidates, and those who insist that A levels, while being a convenient form of entry assessment, are not only misleading in terms of aptitude and potential, but also deny access to many of our best potential architects.

The A-level gateway also tends to discriminate against the less advantaged in our society - particularly the ethnic minorities. (See this column, AJ 10.6.99).

But it's not only the academics and the admissions bureaucrats who drive this requirement for high A-level intakes. One university has progressively raised the standards stated in its prospectus in order to attract applications from students whose middle-class parents would otherwise discourage them from applying to schools with perceived low standards. (Offers at lower pass rates are then made to those showing promise after interview!)

The 7 per cent fall off in applications to first-year courses reported in aj last week will at least have some useful effect in reversing this silly trend towards ever higher A-level grades. That will surely be an advantage, at least to those schools where demand for places is weaker.

But I think we should go much further in contemplating the real benefits of a less 'academic' approach to entry; because in architecture, which for most is a vocational subject, the skills required are not adequately measured or reflected through the A-level examination system.

I am, of course, thinking of communication skills ('dig that trench deeper' or 'take that lousy plaster off now'), as well as skills involved in client liaison, marketing skills, and business acumen; management skills, abilities to co-ordinate and, of course, the (often) instinctive creative abilities that are so necessary to the survival and success of most architects.

In this respect we should take a look at the medics who have been forced by a severe shortage of doctors to review both intake and training. They have at last come to realise that their high A-level requirements (two As plus a B in science-based subjects) have not only led to a shortage of supply, but have created an elite profession, members of which all too often combine high qualifications with a lousy bedside manner.

Where are all those doctors who want to heal, rather than research, many have asked? And how can a profession maintain its credibility when its members do not reflect the population if serves?

In response the gmc has approved a series of innovative courses which include a four-year fast-track training regimen for graduates of any discipline 'who fancy wearing a white coat'. 'Out' is the science orientation and 'in' is a new access route for students who may be in difficulty making the grades at A level.

So, if you know aspiring architects whose recent A-level results were poor, dissuade them from resits and all that nonsense, and suggest that they shop around. Somewhere, there will be a riba/arb-recognised course which suits them well.

I got only a D and an E, yet Canterbury welcomed me and gave me renewed confidence. Roy Caddick and Stuart Lowther joined me there (again on relatively low A-level points) yet each has since had a very successful career - respectively as partners in Watkins Grey and Elsom Pack Roberts. So did Ian Douglas, now a senior architect with Pascall Watson.

Peter Jacob got only two Es, yet his subsequent career has been distinguished - he is now professor of architecture at Kingston University. A levels aren't everything. Indeed, many of our so-called star architects wouldn't qualify for any course in the country.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.