Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Our website is just the job for a small practice

  • Comment

I am very grateful to Sutherland Lyall for his unstinting championing of our website, but a little embarrassed by the continued attention (AJ 10.10.02). There were two principles behind the site's design: l cut the crap; l keep it cheap.

The first may be what makes it attractive to Sutherland: as the profession's Internet supervisor he must have to wade through a lot of crap. The second may be what would make it attractive to other architects: it took us just a few hours to assemble the site in-house.

Tetrarch may be able to find more features the website could offer (although I'm not sure what else a small practice's website needs), but would it be worth spending more money?

The site is not a work of art; it is simply a model of economy.

Adrian James, Adrian James Architects, Oxford

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.