Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Not the sound of a 'listening president'. . .

  • Comment
Letters

Marco Goldschmied's comments on Alex Reid's performance and motivation drew a personal conclusion from factual observations. Uncomfortable, but fair enough. I was more concerned with Reid's response, which was to request that Goldschmied's question 'be struck from the record because otherwise some potential problems may lie ahead'.

I took this to be a threat of legal action against the RIBA and/or Building Design. While the thought of a presidential candidate suing the RIBA does have its amusing side, this attempt to gag the debate did not sit well with his claim that he would be a listening president if elected. My qualms on this were shared by twice RIBA president, Owen Luder, who said: 'My experience of Alex is that he is not a listener - he has his own agenda.'

It would have been inappropriate for Paul Hyett to either support or distance himself from Goldschmied or Luder's views. It is retrospective debate on Reid's patchy record. Hyett is rightly focusing on the future.

His stamp is that of an ethical architect pursuing good architecture and points of principle, while operating in the hurlyburly of practice. A bit more of that at Portland Place would be just fine.

Jack Pringle, London

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.