Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

No need to conceal the act of plagiarism

  • Comment
LETTERS

Thanks for the usual amusing mix in last week's AJ (17.1.02) - not least in talking of time passing and change. . .

Will Alsop on copying forgets that with 'vital imagination' there is never any need to conceal the source of its borrowing.

'There is a sense of power capable of transforming and renewing what it adopts - too conscious, too exalted, to fear the accusation of plagiarism.'

That was Ruskin and is a far better stand for Koolhaas or Alsop to take.

Even worse is Murray Fraser suggesting (Rogers) buildings only to be valuable in so far as they are different! ('It's not that they were not well designed but just that they added very little to the impact of Pompidou or Lloyd's. . .'

Tough on old Palladio, I would say - and would certainly have Walter Gropius turning in his grave.

John McKean, Brighton

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.