Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Motion question

  • Comment
astragal

The Architecture Club broke with convention last week by lifting the Chatham House Rules which dictate that its proceedings cannot be reported in the press, in deference to the fact that AJ editor Isabel Allen was in the chair. The debate, which took place at London's Royal Automobile Club, asked whether architecture is being sidelined in this age of PPP, D&B, PM, CM, PFI and branding, and asked how architects should rise to the challenge. Roland Paoletti urged architects to fight to regain a leading role in large construction projects, while Robin Nicholson offered an optimistic view of the future, arguing that grumblers should 'stop whingeing and get on with it'. The advice was manifestly ignored by fellow speaker Richard Murphy, who offered a spirited tirade against PFI, arguing that it works against small projects and that the logical outcome of its rise is that 'we will all end up working for WS Atkins'.

He did, however, concede that PFI can be appropriate for projects where the primary, and arguably only, architectural challenge is to transport matter from A to B - namely, sewage plants.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.