Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Massive surge in complaints over phoney architects


The ARB has seen an 85 per cent boom in the number of complaints about people pretending to be architects

The architectural profession’s regulator started 276 separate investigations into alleged misuse of title in the nine months to September alone.

The figure is 85 per cent above the same period last year and has cost the organisation £23,000 more than it planned to spend protecting the title.

General complaints against architects have also continued to rise suggesting a worrying trend of consumer dissatisfaction.

A ‘significant increase’ in costs relating to misuse of title and complaints referred to the Professional Conduct Committee saw the board increase architects’ annual retention fee by 23 per cent in September.

At a board meeting this week the organisation admitted to taking on additional ‘temporary assistance’ to help deal with the torrent of allegations.

ARB registrar Alison Carr warned: ‘We will continue to use temporary assistance for a six month period but next year we will need to think longer term about the increasing impact it could have on our resources.’

Since September, the organisation has reined in its forecasted end of year deficit from £476,000 to £363,000. This was in part due to an unexpected additional income of £37,000 from applications and examinations.

ARB staff have also been warned to avoid speaking to the press after the organisation apologised for reproaching media for describing two practitioners not registered in the UK, Renzo Piano and Daniel Libeskind, as architects.

The board papers said: ‘The email did not help achieve ARB’s aims of raising awareness and a statement was issued which apologised for the email.’ ARB received five complaints and one architect also resigned from its register following the incident.

Carr said the board would discuss a strategy to ‘engage the press so they reflect the UK legislation’ in February.


Subscribe to AJ for £3 per week

Subscribe today and receive 47 issues of the magazine, 12 issues of AJ Specification and full access to TheAJ.co.uk and the AJ Buildings Library

Are you a student?

Students can subscribe to the AJ for £8 per month or £1.60 per week! Click here to start receiving the most recommended magazine for architecture students



Readers' comments (2)

  • Doesn't that make a nonsense of this law when 2 of the finest architect's on the planet can't be called architects in this country.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No it does not make a nonesense of this law, it means that Architects should be registered correctly. There is the same consideration with Law and Medicine where professionals must register in the country they practice. Clearly from this article there is a problem with people 'pretending' to be architects and those who are architects should realise that registration is in their own interest.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.