Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

lpac urges government to act on guidance for tall buildings

  • Comment

The London Planning Advisory Committee has warned that London could end up with no formal guidance on tall buildings for at least another three years if the government ignores the issue in the run-up to the establishment of the Greater London Authority.

In a new report following consultation on its draft advice on high buildings and strategic views in London published in February, lpac said that London could be left with 'an out-of-date policy framework' if the government does not accept the lpac's advice or chooses to issue its own guidance and go out to more consultation.

There were over 90 responses to the draft document - after 500 copies were distributed - mostly offering 'general support' but also proposals for changes of detail. Some said that a vision of London's skyline should be included, but there was no consensus on what the physical shape of the skyline should be. 'Both the 'Canaletto' skyline and a 'Manhattan- type' skyline find favour, but a consensus emerged that the present form of the skyline should be retained,' says the report.

Questions also surrounded what the definition of a high building should be, what constitutes a 'cluster' of skyscrapers, and what heights should be permitted. Concern was also expressed that 'planners are not qualified to assess architectural quality but that site context was important and should be added.'

The Royal Fine Art Commission welcomed the advice but was concerned that the identification of areas suitable for high buildings would increase land values greatly and that suggestions that high buildings should act as 'landmarks' implied that all towers should be isolated.

English Heritage welcomed the work on strategic panoramas, metropolitan views and a mechanism for identifying buildings with a negative impact, but wanted more detail on sustainable development and on dealing with riverside development on the River Thames.

lpac now intends to revise the report and, subject to agreement from its members, to discuss providing guidance with the government.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.