Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

'Low-cost' housing could actually cost the same

  • Comment

It was interesting to see the contestants limbering up for the ODPM/English Partnerships (EP) £60k house competition (AJ 1.4.05). Now the particulars have been published, it is probably worth pausing for a few breaths before jumping out of the blocks.

It has been correctly reported elsewhere that the £60k refers to the build-cost of the house only - excluding land purchase, overheads and developer profit - but the brief now gives some additional constraints that clarify this proposition and perhaps make it seem a little less ambitious.

The minimum unit size for the qualifying £60k homes is 76.5m 2, which works out at £784/m 2. This will sound quite straightforward to most volume housebuilders;

indeed, away from the south-east some will regard it as generous.

Assuming Project Orange's catchily titled '4 x 8 House' has an internal area of only 64m 2, and that it weighs in at, or very near, the £60k target, it could cost up to £930/m 2 - so they have some work to do.

Given that at the 'economy' end of the market many housebuilders will be cheerfully squeezing three bedrooms into a 64m 2 house (the 4 x 8 House only has two), it is also a bit disappointing that the ODPM/EP brief doesn't stipulate what accommodation their 76.5m 2 unit is expected to provide.

So, is this competition misconceived? Definitely not, but it is perhaps misrepresented. The headline publicity around the idea of the £60k house implies that the aim is to produce cheaper housing, but this is not really the case.

The project is about producing better-designed housing at a competitive price. By ruling out improvements involving the small (such as Piercy Conner's Micro Flat) and the expensive (such as Proctor Matthews' work at New Hall in Harlow), the ODPM is now challenging architects and innovative developers to meet housebuilders on their own terms and come up with something better and widely applicable. This is entirely laudable - and, indeed, well overdue.

The interesting bit about this, of course, is one's definition of 'better'. If it has to cost the same as a 'normal' house, just what is it about a modern architectdesigned home that makes it so different, so appealing? I look forward to finding out.

Matthew Wood, Wymondham, Norfolk

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.