Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Look beyond earth to support robust thought

  • Comment
Letters

It is regrettable that audacity. org and Living Marxism consider the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change platitudinous and lacking in robust thought (Letters AJ27.7.00).Robust thought is always to be encouraged, untrammelled by unsupported preconceptions, such as 'the earth has no static carrying capacity'. It would be interesting to hear from Ian Abley, of audacity. org, what 'abstract principles derived from scientific study'he has found to support this conclusion . . . or is it more an ideology? I refer him to the first law of thermo-dynamics. There is, of course, the extra-terrestrial source of all our energy which must be much more directly tapped than via the finite reserves of the fossil fuel-fuel we currently squander.

Architects already have a 'duty of care in the performance of their services'. Nice interpretations of the legal implications of such terms are constantly evolving, but that does not render them unworkable. Neither is there any conflict between that duty of care and experts taking responsibility for their own ideas.

Kate Macintosh, Finch Macintosh Architects, Winchester, Hampshire

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.