Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

letters Listing will spell death for Brunswick's renewal

  • Comment

Poor Patrick Hodgkinson! Despite Allied London's enlightened patronage in appointing the original architect to carry out modifications to his ownbuilding, the Twentieth Century Society feels that this is not good enough and wishes to interfere by having the building listed (News , aj 3.2.00).

It would be sad, but not entirely unpredictable, if English Heritage took this view. What is particularly depressing is that the Twentieth Century Society is taking the lead in this. I thought it was there to champion the ideals of modern architecture which, among other things, is about the ability of buildings to adapt to changing requirements.

Surely its members, of all people, know that listing only preserves the status quo and does nothing to encourage new and exciting designs to come forward.

If the society can't trust the original architect to meddle with his own creation, it should at least have the decency to talk to him before condemning it. The Brunswick Centre is not, as Patrick says, 'a Monument', but it is a living, breathing building that needs a helping hand, not preserved for our 'heritage'. How depressing.

Tom Jestico, Jestico + Whiles Architects, London NW1

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.