For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.
We were more than slightly miffed that your article on Michael Nathenson (aj 23.3.00) says our input on the project was to obtain building regulations approval' for Nathenson and states 'ordinary mortals would have to enlist the help of an architect if they want to follow his (Nathenson's) lead. You have nevertheless credited us as architects. This makes our role unclear, to put it mildly. People who did not know better might think all we did was fill in an application form to Camden.