Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Less is poor

  • Comment

Housing minister Keith Hill, by the way, should have a word with himself about his latest utterance on county houses and rural development. New Labour's latest claim is that it would be wrong to allow further country house development because what country folk want is homes for young people, key workers and the elderly. (They also want hunting, but that is another matter. ) I wonder if the minister has ever thought about building this muchneeded housing as part of Section 106 agreements related to country houses? Has anyone told him that the tradition of the countryside was always to provide homes for workers as part of grand estate developments? I wonder if the country house policy was discussed at Chequers? Does he think history began in 1997?

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.