Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Leave adjudication to those in the know

  • Comment

It does not follow at all than an architect adjudicator will be 'more sympathetic to his own sort' in a contract dispute (Letters, aj 2.7.98). As Mr Harris rightly says, an adjudicator must be impartial. I say that an architect, who is trained anyway to be fair in contract administration, is admirably suited to the role of adjudicator. His or her knowledge of building contracts and the process of building puts him/her in a much better position than a lawyer to assess a dispute and to give a decision - even in the very short period of 28 days. If a particular point of law needs a lawyer's or barrister's opinion, then that should be easy enough for the adjudicator to obtain.

If Mr Harris is suggesting that lawyers should be trained in building matters, that is counter-productive to his idea of streamlining the process of law. Leave building disputes to those who know about building.


riba adjudicator

Canterbury, Kent


3i has asked us to point out that it is a financial institution, rather than a bank (aj 25.6.98).

Paul Hyett's column last week (aj 2.7.98) should have referred to a £6 million new building under construction.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.