Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Lack of clarity: judgment reflects complexity

  • Comment
Letters

Susan Lindsey's view (AJ 18.1.01) that the guidance in the judgement of our recent limitation case against Pollard Thomas and Edwards is 'helpful and clear' should be approached with some caution.

While Justice Tyson found against us on all three grounds of our claim (limitation in contract, in tort and under the Latent Damage Act), he also granted us immediate leave to appeal against his judgment - on all three grounds. Implicit in this is a recognition of the argument on both sides and of the inability of current law to deal clearly with such issues of limitation.

The appeal is due to be heard in November.

Roger Barcroft, Systems and Audit Manager, New Islington and Hackney Housing Association, London EC2

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.