I am at a loss to think why we should have to be subjected to what is tantamount to pornography in what was until now classed as a quality publication.
Do you not think it would have been better to have kept the issues to a relevant subject, ie architecture.
I spend my time trying to avoid being confronted by such rubbish and foul language and am not impressed by your decision to print this type of article.
Yours, very disappointed.
Yvonne Coldwell, MIMgt by e-mail