Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Katherine Shonfield

  • Comment

Prince Charles asserts that the world's great religions have at their heart an environmental ethic. It might be a headache for him, therefore, that the USA, where around 40 per cent of the population attend a religious gathering at least once a month, is probably the most messianic perpetrator of environmental pollution on the planet.

There is, however, something perversely gratifying for an architect at the sight of another profession scuttling after Prince Charles' pro-sustainablity broadside. The comparison by an eminent scientist of Charles to a Dalek shows how his accusations have hit home.

The prince is absolutely right in this.The problem for all of us nowadays, scientists, and architects included, is that the application of good/bad rules based on detached observation, no longer carries credence. It is no coincidence that social science has been virtually dropped from the architectural curriculum of mainstream universities in the UK and USA, over the past 20 odd years, about the same timescale since Prince Charles first articulated mass public disaffection with architecture.

For me, the problem in the prince's own thinking - for example, that religious thought is opposed to modern science, which is responsible for a general lack of holistic understanding - is that this is a fine example of the simple 'scientific' rule he so condemns.

One of the lessons of Poundbury - the prince's own model urban development, built in Dorset - is that formal rules are not enough. Richard Rogers, writing in this week's Observer , questions its construction and energy technology, its lack of social mix, public transport system and use of brownfield land.

Like conventional religion, traditional urban forms pay easy lip service to what a sustainable world might be like. The reality is more profound and complex.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.