Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Jet set

  • Comment
astragal

Manhattan is witnessing a wonderful set-piece battle over the proposed new Olympic stadium to be built in a largely residential area (if it goes ahead).

The project involves extending the subway, and supposedly producing a car-free stadium, courtesy of UK environmental engineer Battle McCarthy. But not everyone is convinced the development is a good idea, not least the editor of the Architect's Newspaper, the Manhattan fortnightly launched earlier this year. According to AN, the proposed stadium is a giant real estate deal which will result in development of a group of tower blocks once the floor area ratio of the neighbourhood is changed;

moreover, there will be underground parking for 5,000 cars; and money intended for low cost housing (some $300 million) will be diverted into the scheme by the city authorities. It needs a Tom Wolfe to do justice to this, especially as New York Times critic Herbert Muschamp is set to give up architecture for fresh fields.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.