Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

It's more a question of not fitting your timings!

  • Comment

I must ask you to publish this correction to Zoë Blackler's article (AJ 9.5.02) which implies without justification, impropriety in the operation of the election procedures for the chair and vice-chair, for which I am responsible as returning officer.

The ARB is not refusing to release details of nominations for its future office holders. In accordance with the election rules, nominations for the posts were circulated to members on Tuesday 7 May. Following that, with their consent, a press release was issued. The fact that this timetable did not suit Blackler is no reason for her suggesting that there is lack of transparency in the process.

The novel proposal put forward by Blackler that the standing of any one candidate or candidates can be a fait accompli against other candidates standing seems ludicrous, given the election rules which require candidates to be nominated by other Board members.As candidates presented themselves, I told each of them of the other nominations.

Finally, no Board member, nor indeed anybody else known to me, has called for the election to be cancelled.

Robin Vaughan, chief executive and registrar, ARB

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.