Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment

This new version of the AJ troubles me, for both sentimental and practical reasons. Having been a subscriber since 1954, three years after graduating from the Bartlett and earning just about enough in my new job in Dublin to support my family, run a VW car and pay the annual subscription to the architectural press, I have kept the faith through all its developmental changes over 50 years.

I usually depart from my live/work home in Hackney every Friday afternoon for a coastal weekend, returning on Monday morning, and always slip my AJ into my weekend shoulder bag. But now, notwithstanding the high-quality paper, printing, writing and colour production, it's too heavy!

The earlier, slim publication was ideal for reading in the tube and mainline trains, but now? the resistance of the binding to one-hand support and page-turning in the issue of 09.06.05 was bad enough, but that of the issue of 16.06.05 seriously obstructed the whole reading process. As for tearing out pages that need to be filed for future reference - the whole thing is far too beautiful!

Louis A Roch, by email

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.