Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Is Pawley just going over old ground?

  • Comment

Re Martin Pawley and Terminal Architecture (aj 21.54.98): have I missed something vital, or is this just one side of the old buildings-versus- architecture debate, going back through Pevsner to the dawn of time? Viz: buildings serve a particular function and no more, while architecture adds art and layers of meaning?

Just possibly human society needs its art and its symbolism, while chocolate eggs need only an automated warehouse. Similarly, books can be stored in and retrieved from a big shed, while readers might prefer something approximating to a library. This seems perfectly natural. Sorry to intrude.


London N5

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.