Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Invest in people, rather than preserve in aspic

  • Comment

I am disappointed to observe that the Twentieth Century Society is to step up opposition to changes proposed for the Byker Estate in Newcastle (AJ 3.10.02). I enjoyed living in the Wall until earlier this year, revelling daily in the spectacular views, the inventive urban design and the exquisitely tuned architectural spaces that Erskine has bestowed upon the people of Byker. It is truly a place worth fighting for, but not with the intention of turning Byker into a museum piece.

Byker is a dynamic, living, changing community. Erskine's architecture is all about responding to the needs and aspirations of the resident community, but as an architect and resident-bychoice, I cringe in shame when intellectuals insist that the heritage value of the buildings overrides the firmitas, utilitas, venustas designated for the working classes. If they truly understand that Erskine originally intended for the estate to serve its residents, rather than vice versa, then the intellectual end of the architectural spectrum should prepare to concede to alternative means of protecting the spirit embodied in Byker.

Investing in people, not aspic, would be particularly effective.

My wife and I moved from Byker because our neighbourhood suddenly deteriorated, and because we were lucky enough to have a choice to do so:

after four years she no longer felt safe at night, and eventually neither did I.

We still have close friends in the Wall, many of whom will freely make available to Catherine Croft a guest bed in their lounge for a full-colour, 24/7 visit. This is a particularly good time of year to visit. One can admire the ritual of daily pyrotechnics which necessitates the proposed Fire Station which the Twentieth Century Society assesses as a threat to the architecture of Byker.

Tim Robinson, Gateshead

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.