Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Indulgent speculation about logos and cool

  • Comment
Letters

'Gentleman's club'; 'masonic lodge'; 'abolition' of the heraldic crest. An interesting choice of words (AJ 7.12.00) - when did the members stop beating their spouses and sending children up chimneys?

Apparently, not only is our institute to be modernised but it must first be tarred and feathered with the dark spin of political correctness to justify such actions. So the future is bright, it's a new logo then.

(Who decides? And, more importantly, who's paying? ) This certainly is shallow stuff and for once I find myself in agreement with Owen Luder:

'There are far more important things. . .' Like electing a president who might curtail all this nonsense and enable authority and accountability to return to the membership and regions.

It strikes me that the current 'regime' is still beset by the undercurrents of 'cool Britannia' and that what is afoot in all of this is simply a refurbishment project:

the conversion of what some may perceive as the 'Athenaeum' into 'Groucho's'.The result is still a club (for Rather Indulgent British Architects).

Should you need an example of how an organisation can 'turn itself round' and promote the best of architectural talent and still retain its historical foundations as well as its logo, look no further than Bedford Square.

Simon Danischewsky, Cambridge

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.