Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Image builder

  • Comment
astragal

My attention has been brought to a recent article by one of the candidates for the London mayoralty, Stephen Norris, in Property Week.

In it, he suggested that CABE should be abolished on the grounds that we do not need 'a pompous collection of the great and good to tell us what constitutes decent architecture'. Fascinatingly, he tells us he doesn't like the Lloyd's Building or Norman Foster's Swiss Re, but that the latter is 'redeemed' by the British Museum. He also suggests that planners must have been on drugs when they gave consent for the buildings he (Norris) doesn't like. It doesn't stop there; in a reference to the audit of CABE's governance currently grinding away, he says Sir Stuart Lipton 'might reflect that, in public life, perception is as important as reality'. Well, how about the common perception of Norris as an overweight Tory Lothario with a credibility problem? Or that a man who claims that 'saboteurs'were responsible for a train crash caused by poor track maintenance by a company he now chairs, isn't fit to run the public lavatories in Leicester Square, let alone become mayor of London.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs