Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment

Questioning the status and purpose of architectural 'icons'must be healthy, especially for an architectural media which sometimes seems obsessed by image and little else. Graham Morrison's thoughtful analysis at the AJ/Bovis Royal Academy dinner is reported on our news pages this week; there was a piquant moment looking round the room to realise that many of the architect guests present have been responsible for icons up and down the land. It must be said that the Morrison thesis is not that iconic buildings are necessarily bad, but that there must be some distinct valid purpose in the programme to generate what may be an icon.

His objection was to the production of an icon as an end in itself. Among those present, Will Alsop, Peter Cook, Ian Ritchie, Amanda Levete, David Marks and Julia Barfield and Farshid Moussavi have all been responsible for the sort of buildings and structure GM was describing. 'His attitude is one I have been fighting for 40 years, ' muttered Cook. 'I always suspected that was what he [GM] thought and now I know, ' said Alsop as he headed for a cigarette break. He probably didn't know that Morrison likes Alsop's icon building for Goldsmith's College. The discussion deserves to run.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.