Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Human rights threat to Prescott planning power

  • Comment

John Prescott's ability to call in planning applications for public inquiry has been left in grave doubt after the High Court ruled that his powers go against newly adopted human rights legislation.

At the conclusion of four test cases brought by developers last month, judges said that the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions is not 'an independent and impartial tribunal'as demanded by the Human Rights Act. They argued: 'What is objectionable . . . is that he should be judge in his own cause where his policy is in play. In other words, he cannot be both policy maker and decision maker.' This could mean that local authorities become the final arbiters on all planning decisions and has raised fears that major schemes, such as Terminal Five at Heathrow, could be given the go-ahead with very limited public scrutiny from beyond the boundaries of the immediate local authority.

'The [dual] system, although it has served us well, appears to be in fundamental conflict with the Human Rights convention, 'said Royal Town Planning Institute human rights expert Peter Wilbraham.

Planning minister Nick Raynsford indicated in Parliament that the judgement will be taken to the court of appeal.Existing public inquiries will not be affected by the decision.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.