Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

House of Lords rejection set to scupper Planning Bill

  • Comment

Serious delays in the House of Lords are set to hit the long-awaited Planning Bill, with one eminent peer even predicting the government will scrap it.

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) has admitted it expects the Lords to reject the bill after it clears the Commons in May.

Liberal Democrat Baroness Hamwee, a vice president of the Town and Country Planning Association, said the government needed to drop one piece of legislation this year because of lack of time. 'I expect it to be the Planning Bill, ' she said.

A hold-up in the Lords will delay royal assent, initially timetabled for the summer, to 'sometime in 2004 at the earliest' - months behind John Prescott's original schedule. An ODPM spokesman admitted the bill had caused 'major disquiet' in the upper chamber about the government's failure to 'commit to sustainability'.

'There have been many popular misconceptions about the bill and there is a lot of widespread frustration, ' he said. 'I expect the Lords to kick up a fuss and insist that the Commons takes another look.' The spokesman added that opponents of the bill in the Lords are also 'determined to force the government' to drop its commitment to remove legislative power from the county councils.

Hamwee said that many in the Lords believe the Planning Bill is a 'waste of time'.

'This was supposed to be a 'big bang' approach to reforming the system for the benefit of business, ' she told the AJ. 'It has not happened and all most people want now is for the current system to be made to work better.'

The Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors is also keen for the Lords to force the Commons to reassess the bill, already proposing amendments to peers. 'We are frustrated with the government and the bill and want to encourage real changes, ' said policy director Michael Chambers.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.