Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hated past may still be our beloved future

  • Comment
letters

It is interesting to compare the difference in approach between 1672 and 2005. In your article on St Mary Aldermary (AJ 24.2.05), you point out how Christopher Wren chose to reconstruct in Gothic to blend in with the surviving parts. CF Møller clearly sees the rundbogenstil of the Natural History Museum as an embarrassment that regrettably cannot be knocked down, but at least the practice can ensure its extension does its damnedest to disassociate itself from its predecessor.

Perhaps architects of today wouldn't be so cavalier if they only remembered that history tends to be cyclic, and that the detested styles of the past may also be the styles of the future.

Perhaps they will build a fullblooded Gothic wing on to the Hammersmith Ark, ruin the setting of the 'gherkin' by surrounding it with Baroque offices, or think they are being conscientious when they save the facade of Lloyd's of London, while ripping out its guts and building in a suite of Adam-esque interiors.

Martin Choules, via email

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.