Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Grade trouble

  • Comment
ASTRAGAL

Feathers have been distinctly ruffled in the dovecote of architectural academe following the latest Research Assessment Exercise, the fouryearly review which determines levels of funding the schools will enjoy in future years.The lowest rating that can be awarded is a 1, the highest a 5. You can get 5* if all the work is of international quality.

There are further categories of award. If the rating is accompanied by an 'A', it means all eligible staff are 'research active'. A 'B'means that only a proportion is regarded thus. Those traditional bastions of excellence, Cambridge and the Bartlett, previously in the highest category, have plunged to a 4.

Were there any beneficiaries? Yes indeed. Top of the list was the Welsh School of Architecture, with a 5A; other good performers were Sheffield and Bath, with 5B each.

Needless to say, the academic world being what it is, the hunt is now on to establish the links between those who made the assessments and their mates in the schools that did well. There is, of course, no external academic assessment of whether staff in the schools are any good at teaching people to be architects.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.