Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Getting to the root of the problem

  • Comment

As an arboriculturalist who enjoys flicking through his colleagues' AJ I was interested to see a feature about a 'green' school design (AJ 25.1.01) with a 'major/ancient tree as a focal point, resource and school symbol'.

As I took in the proximity of structures and possible groundlevel changes to trees, dark clouds began to gather as I thought of my own experiences where trees are retained but often destroyed due to a lack of understanding of how the proposals will affect them. This is a result of not obtaining arboricultural advice early enough in the design stage. How many readers would know that raising the levels around a tree can be as damaging as severing its roots?

The same issue featured Frensham Heights School, an attractive building near what appeared to be a line of oak trees in early maturity. The article said that pile foundations had protected the trees.

The sparse crown and dieback must just be coincidence.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.