Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Get your Act together

  • Comment
technical & practice - The Disability Discrimination Act now applies to employers with any number of employees. Do all your properties comply?

From the beginning of this month, providers of goods, facilities and services will have to demonstrate that they have taken reasonable steps to remove, alter or provide alternative means of avoiding physical features that make it impossible or unreasonably difficult for disabled people to use or access their services. The Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) now applies to employers with any number of employees.

The assessment of what is 'reasonable' includes assessing the costs, benefits and practicalities of making the adjustments. All architects should have carried out a full access audit of their property portfolios to assess which properties do not comply, and will have highlighted those areas of non-compliance. The next step is to identify potential solutions with costs. By now, all should be ready with prepared programmes for implementation.

For any service provider who has not even got to the access audit stage, we have drawn up a generic list to check that your own house is in order and your designs for others - but note that this is no substitute for a full access audit. Please copy the checklist below and use it to identify access considerations.

Each feature should be assessed on a range of disability criteria including, inter alia, wheelchair use, ambulant disability, visual and auditory impairment, limited dexterity and cognitive difficulties (learning difficulties, etc).

We recommend that items be ticked off, but also that comments be written on the form to explain your chosen actions (or lack of action). The audit should then prioritise action, based on the safety, expense (identify whether minor or major budget costs), regulatory requirements and general best-practice criteria.

In the service industry, the general focus appears to be on level access at the main entrance/s and assisting disabled customers in navigating stores.

An architect should advise individual service providers how to use these access audits to prioritise and properly programme the identified works, thereby demonstrating intent and - once again - that key word: 'reasonableness'.

John Patterson is an architect at Styles & Wood's StorePlanning division

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.