Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Foreign students must earn £20k to stay


Architects have spoken out against tough new immigration rules for foreign students set to come into place ‘within weeks’

New Home Office guidance will mean overseas students must earn at least £20,000 a year and work for ‘reputable’, approved outfits to stay in the country after completing their courses.

Currently students may work in the UK for two years after graduating, irrespective of their earnings.

Robert Adam of ADAM Architecture described the shake-up as yet ‘another restriction where decent firms end up having to suffer because of the crooks’.

Complaining that the coalition’s recent changes to immigration rules had made it ‘much more difficult’ for his practice to hire overseas staff, he said: ‘I thought the Conservatives wanted to reduce red tape’.

The Architecture Students Network – which launched this week to replace Archaos – hit out at the move, saying it could have a disproportionate effect on year-out students.

‘Many stay in the UK after completing their Part 1, and with the current economic situation, [it will be hard] to earn in excess of the proposed amount,’ a spokesperson said. ‘Recent data shows an average pay of £17,692 a year for post-Part 1 students.’

The measures could also increase the ‘brain drain’ trend of UK-trained international students setting up practice overseas, they claimed.

‘It’s a shame as the UK should be doing more to encourage graduates not only to stay, but to expand the architectural talent pool in this country.’

Nick Willson of Nick Willson Architects said the £20,000 figure was ‘not too high’ for employing Part 2 graduates, but emphasised the importance of securing a ‘range’ of people from different countries in practice.

He said: ‘We are operating in an international world and don’t want to become too separate from it. China is booming and we need to maintain good links – [UK] education and our excellent brand should be encouraged.’

Immigration minister Damian Green said: ‘It is vital that we continue to attract the brightest and the best international students, but we have to be more selective about who can come here and how long they can stay.

‘In the past, too many students have come to the UK to work rather than study, and this abuse must end.’


Postscript: Comment by David Gloster, RIBA director of education


Whilst any changes to the current situation are likely to have implications, the proposed revisions to the visa regulations will not necessarily be detrimental to the numbers of international students wishing to study in the UK.  The appeal of UK architecture education lies in its exploratory nature, and the high degree of academic flexibility our schools offer their students.  Equally, many major practices operating globally are based in the UK, thus potential employment in UK practice is an added inducement for overseas students to continue to study here

Post part 1 graduates on their year out are not interns; if employed by an RIBA Chartered Practice, they will be in remunerated employment paying at least the National Minimum Wage.  From an immigration standpoint, overseas students on their year out may retain their status as students as work placements are permitted, for which there is no minimum threshold salary requirement set by the UK Border Agency

Research currently being undertaken by the RIBA indicates that there are considerable variations in salaries from region to region, and, in some, salaries are likely to be below the threshold stated for the Tier 2 visa likely to be available for part 2 graduates.  Therefore, there are concerns the proposed changes will affect overseas students.  The RIBA will emphasise this concern, using its research to argue that the immigration salary threshold for post part 2 placements must be in line with norms for remuneration in the profession as a whole.






Readers' comments (2)

  • Current students may wish to review this website:
    The Post-study Work category terminates on 5 April 2012, meaning an international student graduating in 2012 or after will require the typical work permit. In effect, this graduate, unless outcompeting all other UK or EU candidates, will likely have to seek work elsewhere.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tatiana Telles Ferreira

    I do not understand why architectural firms think this 20K bench mark will create a brain drain. 20K is what firms should be paying a part 1 anyway, especially those who are based in London.
    Nick Wilson is correct, 20K is not too high for part 2's, in fact I would say to Mr Wilson that it is disgracefully low. According to a study by the Joseph Rowntree foundation a person needs to earn a 15,000 a year to achieve a minimum standard of living. It makes you wonder what is the point in studying for 5 years (costing 3-9000 a year) if all you can look forward to is 5000 over the minimum. You might as well have joined an apprenticeship at Tesco where you get paid to train.

    Therefore the real cause of a brain drain in the profession is practices who do not pay enough. This has already been seen by the reduction of students applying to study architecture in the first place. They realise it just is not worth it.

    Jay Morton

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.