Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Fire-protection methods in article not standard

  • Comment
letters

The Association for Specialist Fire Protection (asfp) would like to comment on the article entitled 'Dry-lining fire threat' (aj 15.7.99).

The system as described would appear to detail a method for the fire protection of structural steel. Such a method is not recognised in the construction industry as being a dry-lining system, but it does use fire- tested boards of various types. A dry-lining system is entirely different to a boarded fire-protection installation to structural steel and is used for a totally different application.

We feel very strongly, therefore, that it is most misleading to state that the fire threat was due to a 'dry-lining system'. It should also be noted that if there is a need to seal board joints for structural-steel fire protection, it should be specified at the design stage, since every uk board manufacturer would be able to recommend a suitable method of achieving a satisfactory deal.

Ron Smith, ASFP technician, Aldershot, Hampshire

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.