Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Farrell's houses sure don't court peasants

  • Comment
letters

Farrell's court houses are fascinating; and not least for their conscious reference to precedent (AJ 4.12.03).

The comparison of humane, post-war austerity intelligence - seen in Utzon's lovely courtyard clusters - with these pavilions 'with a guide price' of £4 million sure takes the breath away.

I suspect it might be a slightly unsure conscience which forces discussion to a 100m 2court house. As well as to counter, as you say, 'the suggestion that large floorplates are a prerequisite'; but prerequisite for what you do not suggest; is it a civilised life?

No suggestion is made of how these 'prototype' units might cluster or be orientated. But perhaps a glance at an even earlier post-war austerity example could be instructive: contrast Farrell's with Walter Segal's even smaller, but surely more habitable, court houses at the core (and on the endpapers) of his Home & Environment of 1948.

And Farrell doesn't even offer his 21st-century peasants a downstairs loo.

(PS: Regarding your quote on page 14 of the same issue, Robbie Williams' take on Sinatra standards is miles better than John Simpson's 'ghastly phone box'. ) John McKean, Brighton

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.