Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Eyesores of the Westminster kind

  • Comment

Why does Barry Sheerman mp think he has a divine right to go around identifying architectural eyesores for demolition (aj 23.4.98)? The language he employs to describe these buildings is that of the Prince of Wales, of course: they are 'carbuncles'. It is worrying that he thinks that these eyesores are self-evident, and that he proposes spending vast new amounts of Lottery money on their replacements. A cursory knowledge of the history of post- war demolition would tell us that one man's eyesore is another man's historical masterpiece - look at the way we used to think about Victorian architecture.

Mr Sheerman seems to be jumping on a populist bandwagon, and his choice of eyesores is bizarre: Ronald Ward & Partners' elegant Millbank Tower, and Colonel Seifert's Centre Point. If he has a problem with height, why doesn't he say so?



  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.