Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment

The column headed 'percentage change in uk fee income' in the aj's top 100 (aj 29.3.99) in the table headed 'uk Architectural Fee Income 1998' (page 45) should have read 'fee income per architect'.

A brand is worth having, and therefore defending

It may be unnecessary to say this, but here goes: would the small-minded people who endlessly talk about independence of, and splitting from, the mainstream profession as represented by the RIBA in Portland Place tell us why they wanted to be members in the first place? There is no shame whatsoever in wanting the initials RIBA after your name, as a mark that you have passed your professional exams, have willingly accepted the disciplines of an independent professional body, and are happy to be a member of an organisation that has both national and international recognition. There are always arguments for greater autonomy on the part of all regions and branches, and they should be acknowledged. But not at the expense of denying the usefulness of a national asset which has stood the test of time.

Richard Farquhar


  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.