Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Edinburgh big enough to beat the superblock

  • Comment

I can only think that professor Brian Edwards is misquoted, or quoted out of context, when he welcomes Robert Adam's plan for Leith by stating: 'Edinburgh has always been based on Neo-Classical principles.' (AJ 10.3.05) The essence of Edinburgh lies in the tension between the loosefit planning of the medieval Old Town and the planning of the Classical New Town - a recent introduction, from the late 18th century. Pre-Georgian Scottish urban planning was based around long, linear 'mercats' (markets) with narrow closes off - the classic 'fishbone' pattern - which gives the lie to the Krier brothers' dogmatic insistence that the European city consists entirely of squares, streets and blocks.

Such thinking represents the triumph of one model - the European superblock, with its overshadowed and claustrophobic back courts - over all others.

While Adam's plan (detail above) may well be humane and sensible, I'd like to think that in Edinburgh - as elsewhere - it is not considered the only approach possible.

Malcolm Fraser , Malcolm Fraser Architects, Edinburgh

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.