Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Does ARB code cast its net a little too widely?

  • Comment
letters

I am in a quandry: I received today my copy of the new arb Architects (sic) Code, which I note from the covering letter is operative from the date of its posting! It is lucky that the code is not retrospective, otherwise I would be experiencing worse worries than I am.

This Christmas I spent more than I could afford on the children's presents, thus breaking the arb Code, Standard 9, stating that 'architects should ensure that their personal finances are managed prudently.' Now, according to Standard 10, the whistle-blower's clause, my wife, with whom I am in partnership, has to turn me in.

Sadly, if events take the course that I fear they must, I will then be removed from the register and, unfortunately, she will then need to resign from our practice under the Codes.' Standard 1, which states that architects should not be a partner with a person whose name has been removed from the Register of Architects by virtue of disciplinary measures.

Can any of your readers suggest a course of action to save my practice, marriage and/or my sanity should events such as these transpire again?

Martin Ungless, Edinburgh

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.