Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Different take

  • Comment
astragal

There is more to this story than meets the eye, however. While it is true that the school idea was long abandoned and its formal closure inevitable, it can scarcely be said that the Prince has lost either his interest in architecture or his promotion of all things Classical. The difference is that he has reached a modus vivendi with people who would otherwise have been reluctant to give his ideas house room. I note that the Prince's Foundation is working, among others, with CABE on issues about healthy buildings and creating new communities. But these days the foundation agrees to disagree over matters of 'style', which is just being grown-up. And courtesy of the gaggle of Americans who fawn on the royal connection and are still promoting Seaside as though it is new, design codes are now the order of the day, following the visit there last year of that well-known monarchist John Prescott. It is a mistake to underestimate the Prince and his influence - for good or ill.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.