Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Developing clarity - and backed up by minister?

  • Comment
Letters

I do not wish to prolong the debate about housebuilder works and permitted development rights, but the letter from Alan Kennedy (AJ 18.10.01) needs to be clarified further.

Firstly, the general permitted development order makes no firm definition relative to the legal extent of a domestic curtilage, nor explains how one is permitted to build (legally or illegally) within or adjacent to it.

A 'certificate of lawfulness' decision, which therefore denies a legal planning right, must therefore be legally suspect and open to challenge if repeated elsewhere by planning authorities or inspectors. Finally, the views of Chris Chope - as a planning minister interpreting law - carry weight with my argument, particularly in view of his own past legal background.

Keith Evans, London EC14

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.