Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Debate is backbone of listed buildings system

  • Comment
Letters

David Taylor makes continuity sound like a revolution (AJ 29.11.01). The government decides what buildings are listed and this will remain the case.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport is required to seek the advice of English Heritage on listing matters (and accepts 99 per cent of our proposals), but has always been free to seek the views of others. Since the mid-1990s all post-war candidates for listing have been subject to wide public consultation.

A formal role for CABE is to be welcomed as another perspective on the importance of design and innovation in the built environment. This decision by the department does not mark a change in policy. CABE and EH work together (on English Heritage's Urban Panel, for example) to ensure new development in towns and cities is informed by a full understanding of the historic context.

Issues such as these form the subject of English Heritage's most recent Conservation Bulletin (No 41, September 2001), to which I commend readers who would like to know more about our current approach to urban and design matters.

Dr Martin Cherry, director of national programmes, English Heritage, London W1

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.